Paramultart wrote:But just out of curiosity, what credibility do you have to contradict the Keen Wiki?
Hahaha, fair enough question (though I was hoping that my "feature list" was tongue-in-cheek enough to avoid it). Almost all of the deviations from the KeenWiki are just changes to some unofficial level names, and since the unofficial level names found on the KeenWiki are based on the names that I made up for cc314's
interactive level-maps, I like to think I have some credibility there.
It also turns out that I've more recently found an official source that actually states that the Mangling Machine is powered by the BPSA, so I guess that even when I was making stuff up, I was right.
Eros wrote:cool. is it possible to add simple buttons like they have on wikipedia and such? it would speed up finding stuff a few times.
Unfortunately, as it's a .txt file, hyperlinking isn't possible. If it really bothers you, you are of course permitted to make a beautiful HTML version of the FAQ.
An alternate way to find the section you're looking for is to search for the bracketed number from the Table of Contents. For example, searching for [5.2.2] will take me right to the section of SGA translations for Keen 2.
VikingBoyBilly wrote:In the keen 5 letter translation you've written "ANDROID DUPLICATE". Isn't it supposed to say "ANDROID DUMMY"?
You scared me for a minute there! But yeah, it does say ANDROID DUPLICATE.
DHeadshot wrote:Spot the blatant error:
GARG!
I would manage to screw up something as important as the shoot button while making sure that the Function Keys are properly explained. Now I know how the Johns/Jason must have felt when the Molly bug was introduced in Keen 6 v1.4; at one point the control section for Galaxy was perfectly right, but it (and only it) got deleted at a later time and I had to redo it, far too quickly it appears. Oh well, I guess v2.01 will be the last version of the FAQ... If anyone else spots other problems, make sure to mention them and I'll fix 'em too.
Djaser wrote:Well, I'm not exactly pro-piracy, I thought your notes on piracy are over the top.
Yeah, you're right. That's actually one of the sections I haven't touched since the first version of the FAQ. I actually kept it because it was quaint, not because my feeling on piracy are that strong anymore.
Thanks everyone for their response! I actually didn't expect more than one or two replies of "cool", so...I guess it makes it worth it?
And as I said earlier, any other problems you guys find, I'll fix 'em for the final version (and I mean
final, I don't even care if an official TUIT comes out sometime, my work on the FAQ is done).