There Will Be Blood

Allstories · Post by **Allstories** » Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:02

Best movie. Of year. Go see. Right now.

Post by **KeenRush** » Sun Jan 27, 2008 9:14

Hm, there certainly seems to be a lot of praise for it. Haven't heard of it until now... I still don't know what kind of movie it is, however.

But perhaps I'll go to see it, I have two free tickets to spare and I have to spend them before April.

Djaser · Post by **Djaser** » Sun Jan 27, 2008 10:44

It's horror, not my type though. I heard only bad reviews for this part of the series so Allstories claim makes me raise my eyebrows.

Allstories · Post by **Allstories** » Sun Jan 27, 2008 16:31

Uhh, are you thinking of the same movie I'm thinking of? I'm not talking about Saw or something, I'm talking about There Will Be Blood. It's getting a whole bunch of Academy Awards nominations right now.

Djaser · Post by **Djaser** » Sun Jan 27, 2008 19:01

No I was indeed thinking of Saw and that shows that you could have put some more information in your first post.
Anyway, trailer looks good. I will keep an eye on this one.

Post by **KeenRush** » Sun Jan 27, 2008 20:32

Yeah, I too thought that Djaser might be mixing this with some other movie. But agree, there could be a bit more than only the movie title mentioned in the topic title. Anyways, looking at the photos and stuff, wouldn't have expected it to be so brilliant (not my opinion, at least not until I've seen it).

Here's the official page: http://www.paramountvantage.com/blood/

VikingBoyBilly · Post by **VikingBoyBilly** » Wed Dec 16, 2009 23:35

Never seen it

Commander Spleen · Post by **Commander Spleen** » Thu Dec 17, 2009 0:18

^ Massiver bump from an oldschool necromancer.

Djaser · Post by **Djaser** » Thu Dec 17, 2009 8:47

VikingBoyBilly wrote: Never seen it

DUUUUUUUUDE!!!!

THAT IS AMAZING!!!!!!!

ZidaneA · Post by **ZidaneA** » Thu Dec 17, 2009 10:40

Djaser wrote:No I was indeed thinking of Saw and that shows that you could have put some more information in your first post.

Although I agree that his post was pretty empty, I don't think you should blame him. You could have done some research since he actually wrote There Will Be Blood, not "OH YES, THERE WILL BE BLOOD" as quoted from the SAW III poster.

Djaser · Post by **Djaser** » Fri Dec 18, 2009 10:07

ZidaneA wrote:
Djaser wrote:No I was indeed thinking of Saw and that shows that you could have put some more information in your first post.
Although I agree that his post was pretty empty, I don't think you should blame him. You could have done some research since he actually wrote There Will Be Blood, not "OH YES, THERE WILL BE BLOOD" as quoted from the SAW III poster.

I blame who I want.
Why don't you just shut the fucl up about a post of early 2008, mkay?

ZidaneA · Post by **ZidaneA** » Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:04

Djaser wrote:
ZidaneA wrote:
Djaser wrote:No I was indeed thinking of Saw and that shows that you could have put some more information in your first post.
Although I agree that his post was pretty empty, I don't think you should blame him. You could have done some research since he actually wrote There Will Be Blood, not "OH YES, THERE WILL BE BLOOD" as quoted from the SAW III poster.
I blame who I want.
Why don't you just shut the fucl up about a post of early 2008, mkay?

I didn't see it was from 2008.
That is not a good way to make someone regret something though. I find you really immature. It's not that like you're making things better.

But then again, some people have the need to say such unnecessary things to emphazise themselves.

Djaser · Post by **Djaser** » Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:44

ZidaneA wrote:
Djaser wrote:
ZidaneA wrote: Although I agree that his post was pretty empty, I don't think you should blame him. You could have done some research since he actually wrote There Will Be Blood, not "OH YES, THERE WILL BE BLOOD" as quoted from the SAW III poster.
I blame who I want.
Why don't you just shut the fucl up about a post of early 2008, mkay?
I didn't see it was from 2008.
That is not a good way to make someone regret something though. I find you really immature. It's not that like you're making things better.

But then again, some people have the need to say such unnecessary things to emphazise themselves.

You're really not that bright, now are you? You start moaning that I had to do some research about a post of 2008. Maybe you are the one that should pay more attention?
You may not like the way that I respond to you, but this exactly what you deserve after playing the wise guy and sticking your nose in someone else his business.

Love,
Djaser

ZidaneA · Post by **ZidaneA** » Fri Dec 18, 2009 12:13

Djaser wrote:
ZidaneA wrote:
Djaser wrote: I blame who I want.
Why don't you just shut the fucl up about a post of early 2008, mkay?
I didn't see it was from 2008.
That is not a good way to make someone regret something though. I find you really immature. It's not that like you're making things better.

But then again, some people have the need to say such unnecessary things to emphazise themselves.
You're really not that bright, now are you? You start moaning that I had to do some research about a post of 2008. Maybe you are the one that should pay more attention?
You may not like the way that I respond to you, but this exactly what you deserve after playing the wise guy and sticking your nose in someone else his business.

Love,
Djaser

There is a difference between doing research and paying attention.

I wasn't playing the "wise guy". I just disproved you. I don't think I should be treated like garg just because of that.
This is a forum, and on a forum, everyone can respond to anyones post. That's the concept of a forum, if you didn't know. If you felt that your post shouldn't be answered by anyone but Allstories, you should've sent him a PM. Simple.

Djaser · Post by **Djaser** » Fri Dec 18, 2009 13:01

No it would have been fine if someone responded two years ago. Telling someone what to do after this period is not.